Talk:Phimosis

From IntactWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Are separate articles warranted?

I have begun the article on phimosis. It consists of a merger of what we have back on intactipedia, as well as the phimosis article on wikipedia. It's not entirely transferred, as it is stated at the top of this article that it is "under construction." I have encountered certain terminology that may each deserve an article in its own right, including "stages of normal development," "preputial stenosis" and "retraction of the foreskin." Possible even "non-retractability," though that may just be part of "retraction of the foreskin." I think as much as possible, we should work in this wiki to untangle the web surrounding phimosis and the normal stages of development, so others can see it and the problem could eventually be remedied in our textbooks etc. What are others' views on this? More to come; a picture of "true phimosis" and preputial stenosis to differentiate...

Iwe0101 (talk) 10:30, 17 August 2014 (CDT)

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Tools