On the one hand, we strive to make sure that all our sources are accurate. But wouldn't this page be an example of possible editorialism? Perhaps in some extents, such as this one, we may have to make some exceptions for "original work?"Orly21 01:48, 24 March 2011 (CDT)
- The editorializing comes from the source(s). i.e., if you check the source, you'll find that almost everything is a word-for-word quote.--Thedirt 00:53, 11 April 2011 (CDT)
This is one sick puppy. http://thelittlesnip.nibblebit.com/category/africa/
I found the following links... perhaps they have a broader scope than JUST circumfetishism? I don't know where else to put them but here...
Orly21 01:38, 9 June 2011 (CDT)